Higher School of Social Psychology
The objective of this commentary is to critically evaluate the article by Tomasz Witkowskiand Paweł Fortuna. While I recognize the importance of some issues raised by the authors I point, however, to irregularities in coming to conclusions and to existing – in my opinion – defects in their process of seeking evidence.
Keywords: provocation, quasi-science, quasi-proof
Cite this article as:
Kulesza, W. (2008). On the quasi-scientific quasi-proof of the quasi-scientific character of science or on the journalist but not scientific provocation. Psychologia Społeczna, 9, 345-348.