Notice: Funkcja WP_Scripts::localize została wywołana nieprawidłowo. Parametr $l10n musi być tablicą. Aby przekazać dane do skryptów, proszę użyć funkcji wp_add_inline_script(). Dowiedz się więcej: Debugowanie w WordPressie. (Ten komunikat został dodany w wersji 5.7.0.) in /home/platne/serwer68564/public_html/ on line 5866

Number 4 (2007)

Reykowski, J. (2007). Group processes and solving antagonistic conflicts: Is the idea of deliberative democracy a psychologically feasible proposition

177 views 4 maja, 2007 admin 0

Janusz Reykowski
Polish Academy of Sciences & Warsaw School of Social Psychology

Social psychological research suggests that under certain conditions social groups can engender powerful „synergic tendencies” that facilitate development of shared cognitions among group members. As a result of these processes, the groups can reach an agreement. The purpose of this research was to identify these conditions and test their effects. The research consisted of a series of group debates concerning important issues that evoked strong controversies among the participants, i.e. parents of school children who discussed sex education in schools (20 debates, 195 participants), politicians representing right wing and left-wing parties who discussed the same topic (7 debates, 35 participants), and residents of a county at the east part of Poland who argued about the site of a garbage collection (10 debates, 100 participants). Six to 13 persons took part in each debate, which usually lasted 100-110 minutes. The debates were conducted by a facilitator according to specially prepared scenarios. Before and after the debate, participants filled out special questionnaires measuring their attitudes and some psychological variables. The debates were recorded on videotape. The obtained data support the contention that social groups tend to engender synergic forces inducing group members to seek agreements in spite of differences. They also indicate that under specific conditions (perceived importance of common tasks, induction of deliberative norms, group authority that supports the task and the norms) the groups can reach agreements even in situations of serious ideological conflict or conflict of interests. The experience of working for agreement can influence participants’ attitudes not only toward the debated issues but also toward the more general strategies of dealing with political disagreements. On the basis of the obtained data a general model of the relationship between synergic and antagonistic tendencies in groups has been formulated.
Keywords: conflict, deliberation, democracy, norms, social group, social identity, social influence

Cite this article as:

Reykowski, J. (2007). Group processes and solving antagonistic conflicts: Is the idea of deliberative democracy a psychologically feasible proposition? Psychologia Społeczna, 4, 97-119.
Download original article (Open Access)

Warning: filesize(): stat failed for /home/platne/serwer68564/public_html/ in /home/platne/serwer68564/public_html/ on line 1178
# File Type File Size Download
1 .pdf reykowski_2007_2

Help us spread the news about this research!